ShipFast vs Supastarter: Which Next.js Boilerplate Should You Choose?
A detailed head-to-head comparison of ShipFast and Supastarter. We break down pricing, features, and use cases to help you pick the right Next.js SaaS boilerplate.
ShipFast vs Supastarter: Which Next.js Boilerplate Should You Choose?
ShipFast and Supastarter are two of the most popular Next.js SaaS boilerplates in 2026. Both promise to save you months of development time, but they take different approaches. Which one is right for your project?
Let's break it down.
Quick Comparison#
| Feature | ShipFast | Supastarter |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $199 | $299 |
| Framework | Next.js | Next.js + Nuxt |
| Multi-tenancy | ❌ | ✅ |
| i18n | ❌ | ✅ |
| Payments | Stripe, Lemon Squeezy | Stripe, Lemon Squeezy |
| Database | MongoDB, Supabase | Supabase, others |
| Auth | NextAuth | Better Auth |
| Philosophy | Ship fast, minimal | Comprehensive, enterprise-ready |
The Philosophies#
ShipFast: Speed to Market#
ShipFast is built around one core principle: ship fast. Created by Marc Lou, an indie hacker known for launching products quickly, ShipFast gives you everything you need to launch—and nothing you don't.
The codebase is intentionally lean. Features are implemented in the most straightforward way possible. The goal is to get your MVP in front of users in days, not weeks.
Supastarter: Comprehensive Foundation#
Supastarter takes a different approach: build once, scale forever. It provides a more comprehensive foundation with features like multi-tenancy and internationalization that you might not need today but will appreciate as you grow.
The codebase is more complex, but that complexity serves a purpose—handling edge cases and enterprise requirements that simpler boilerplates punt on.
Feature Deep Dive#
Authentication#
Winner: Supastarter for enterprise needs, ShipFast for simplicity
Multi-Tenancy#
ShipFast: Not included. You can add it, but it's not baked in.
Winner: Supastarter (clear win if you need teams)
Payment Processing#
Both support Stripe and Lemon Squeezy with subscription management.
- ShipFast keeps it simple—basic subscriptions work out of the box
- Supastarter adds metered billing and more complex pricing models
Winner: Tie for basic needs, Supastarter for complex billing
Internationalization#
Winner: Supastarter (if you need it)
Code Quality Comparison#
ShipFast
Simple, readable code
Minimal abstraction
Easy to understand quickly
Great for learning
Supastarter
Well-organized architecture
TypeScript throughout
More abstraction layers
Better separation of concerns
Winner: Supastarter for maintainability, ShipFast for simplicity
Documentation & Support#
ShipFast: Good documentation focused on getting started fast. Video tutorials available. Active Discord community.
Supastarter: Comprehensive documentation covering setup, customization, and advanced use cases. 950+ developer community.
Both have active communities and regular updates.
When to Choose ShipFast#
When to Choose Supastarter#
The Third Option: MakerKit#
If you're comparing these two, you should also consider MakerKit. It sits between them in complexity and offers strong B2B features with excellent RBAC. Read our full comparison of all three →
The Verdict#
For B2C products and MVPs: ShipFast's simplicity and lower price make it the better choice. Get to market fast, validate your idea, and add complexity later if needed.
For B2B products with team features: Supastarter's multi-tenancy and comprehensive feature set justify the extra $100. Building these features from scratch would cost far more.
Still not sure? Take our quiz to get a personalized recommendation based on your specific requirements.
Or compare them side by side with our comparison tool.
Not sure which boilerplate to choose?
Take our 2-minute quiz and get personalized recommendations.
Take the Quiz